- ForgeX Files
- Posts
- š® QBR Prep: Benchmarking ABM Success
š® QBR Prep: Benchmarking ABM Success
Demonstrating correlation vs. causation from your ABM efforts.
Whatās up everyone! Welcome to š® Taco Tuesday, a weekly newsletter by ForgeX.
In here we share the latest and greatest around our Account-Based GTM research, provide our perspective on trending topics, and highlight whatās new at ForgeX.
Send us any questions or topics we should break down here ā¬ļø
Lack of a Standardized ABM Data Model
Youāre getting ready for the upcoming QBRā¦
You partnered with your RevOps team to pull all of the data around your defined ABM metrics.
But there are two GLARING questions that your presentation fails to answer:
- āHow is my program performing vs. my peers?ā 
- āDo these metrics prove causation vs. a mere correlation?ā 

Hang tight⦠weāre working on it!
Over the past 60-days, weāve been asked to share benchmark data around āengagement performanceā more times than we can count.
š£ļø Our answer: we donāt have this (yet), and neither does anyone else.
š§ Hereās why:
- The legacy Demand Waterfall (2006 version) that was created by SiriusDecisions is STILL the underlying architecture most VCās and C-suite executives defer back to. 
- A standardized data model that is built for an account-based motion AND has wide-scale adoption doesnāt exist; agencies, ABM platforms and internal teams all build different variations. 
If it feels like we lack a common language around measurement and reporting architecture - itās because we do.
Every organizationās GTM motion is different, so naturally there will be slight variations⦠but there still needs to be a standardized architecture that holds naming conventions, definitions and stages that allow marketers to speak apples-to-apples.
How to Benchmark Success
So we donāt have a standardized ABM data model⦠now what?
Use your internal data to generate benchmark data ā
The main objective of doing so is to demonstrating that your account-based efforts and success are due to causation, and not a mere correlation.
- Causation: refers to a relationship where one event directly results in the occurrence of another event. 
- Correlation: describes a scenario where two or more variables or events are associated with each other in some manner but does not necessarily imply that one causes the other. 
Here are 2 pathways we recommend leveraging.
#1 Benchmarking: Against a Control Group

Internally Benchmarking ABM
Implementation:
- Create two groups: - A ātreatment groupā (your target account list) that is exposed to the initiatives within the ABM program. 
- A ācontrol groupā that is not. 
 
- Both the treatment and control groups should include ālook-alikeā accounts that share similar attributes in order to foster comparability. 
- Track the same metrics for both groups throughout the ABM program, referencing the performance metrics of the control group as a baseline. 
When we recommend this:
- This is our top choice š 
- This method is particularly valuable in isolating the effects of ABM from other variables, providing a clearer picture of causation rather than mere correlation. 
- This approach is ideal for organizations looking for a rigorous analysis of ABM effectiveness and those who can ensure the integrity and comparability of the control and treatment groups over the evaluation period. 
#2 Benchmarking: Pre-ABM Impact vs. Post-ABM Performance

Internally Benchmarking ABM
Implementation:
- Pull all historical data related to your ABM target account list prior to the implementation of the ABM program. Ensure the historical timeframe chosen provides a substantial data set (do not only pull 2-weeks worth of historical data). 
- This should be the same data that will be leveraged in the account-based data model you plan on utilizing in your ABM program to measure success. 
- Conduct a thorough analysis of how your ABM target account list performed historically to establish a baseline. 
When we recommend this:
- You are unable to leverage a control group. 
- Your organization has a stable historical dataset and external market conditions have remained relatively constant. 
Whatās New at ForgeX?
š® Research & Insights

Access the Guide Below
š® Events
Upcoming:
- 1.) ABM Platform Readiness: What You Need to Know - When: 5/8/24 @ 12:30pm ET 
- With: - Anne Murlowski, VP of Marketing @ Terminus 
- Davis Potter, CEO @ ForgeX 
 
- Weāll Discuss: - š How to determine when it's the right time to invest in an ABM Platform 
- š Evaluation criteria you should be using to choose the right tech for your organization 
- š The red flags to watch out for while having your initial conversations with vendors 
 
 
- 2.) How to Hire an Account Based Marketing Expert - When: 5/9/24 @ 12:00pm ET 
- With: - Max Spanier, Founder and CEO @ Sloane Staffing 
- Davis Potter, CEO @ ForgeX 
 
- Weāll Discuss: - š The key skills and experience to look for in an ABM hire 
- š Proven strategies for attracting top ABM talent 
- š How to develop a winning interview process for screening ABM candidates 
 
 
Join +400 ABM leaders and become a ForgeX member to access our full research library, step-by-step frameworks, benchmark data and community.
Have an awesome rest of the week yāall!
LFG,
Davis
